For decades cosmologists have wondered about the nature of dark energy, the
proposed antigravitational force behind the accelerating expansion of the
universe. Since the 1990s astronomers have observed that the universe is not
only expanding, but also increasing its expansion rate. This is very
strange, because the collective gravitational pull of all the “stuff” in the
universe would be expected to eventually reverse cosmic expansion, or at
least slow it down. Instead, just like a ball gently tossed overhead
suddenly soaring off into the heavens, some mysterious force—the
aforementioned “dark energy”—is pushing far-distant, galaxy-filled regions
of space away from us at ever-greater speeds. No known physics has fully
explained this phenomenon; it remains a cosmic enigma, and its true,
as-yet-unknown nature will profoundly shape the ultimate fate of our
universe.
Now, however, a new
theoretical study, submitted for publication at the Journal for Cosmology and Astroparticle
Physics, suggests dark energy’s apparent antigravitational properties may be
the natural, inevitable consequence of how gravity works in the first place,
at the universe’s most fundamental quantum scales. If eventually verified by
further cosmological evidence, the idea would represent a major breakthrough
in the long quest to mend the schism between physicists’ two most cherished
theories: quantum mechanics, which describes the microscopic world of
particles and fields, and general relativity, which describes the
macroscopic cosmos of planets, stars and galaxies. General relativity posits
that gravity is an emergent property of curves and warps in spacetime—the
fabric of reality itself—but the theory loses its predictive power at
quantum scales; conversely, quantum mechanics accurately incorporates all
other known fundamental forces save for gravity, which fails to fit into the
theory. Thus, many physicists suspect a quantum theory of gravity is the
only way to unify these two opposing approaches..
According to Daniele Oriti, a co-author of the new paper, the core idea
behind any theory of quantum gravity is that gravitation arises from a
myriad of tiny, discrete, quantum objects that form a sort of hidden
underworld, a deeper substructure beneath the familiar dimensions of space
and time. “These quantum objects, which are very difficult to imagine,”
Oriti says, “are essentially the building blocks of space itself. They do
not exist in space, but are themselves the very stuff out of which space is
made. If they exist at all, they are absolutely tiny in their size, and are
at a microscopic scale which even the most powerful microscopes cannot see.”
In the study Oriti and his co-author Xiankai Pang, both at the University of
Munich in Germany, focused first on developing a new quantum gravity model
by trying to better understand the force’s properties at the microscopic
level. “Once having constructed our new model,” Oriti says, “we decided to
track it through time from the beginning of our modeled universe, to see
what would happen during the evolution of its expansion. We were definitely
surprised when we saw something closely resembling dark energy. The model
produced an acceleration of the expansion of the universe at the stage
corresponding to the time we are at today, which matches very closely with
current observational evidence.”
“This is quite an elegant result,” says Abhay Ashtekar, an eminent theorist
at Penn State who works on modern theories of quantum gravity and who was
not involved in the new study. “Because the new approach begins with a
general framework for quantum gravity at the subspace level, and then
applies it to the cosmological scale, while in other methods one restricts
oneself to the cosmological context right from start, the new idea is
beginning from a more fundamental perspective than we have done before, and
that is an advantage.”
Oriti explains that the model's acceleration of the expansion of the
universe, during the stage corresponding to today, is caused by interactions
between the subspace quantum objects that make up gravity in the theory.
After the expanding universe reaches a critical volume, these quantum
objects begin to interact with each other in new ways. It is a bit like
baking a cake. Imagine a cake where the yeast—in this case the subspace
quantum objects—is not so important until a critical temperature—in this
case the volume of the universe—is reached, whereafter conditions are just
right to kick it into action, causing a rapid expansion. In the quantum
gravity model, this is what causes the emergence of the dark energy–like
phenomenon, which is characterized by an acceleration of the growth in
volume of space.
“In the model, during the early universe, when the volume is small, the
quantum objects out of which space emerges, interact in a manner which makes
them subdominant compared to their large-scale long-term evolution,” says
Oriti. “But then, because the universe keeps expanding through time, at some
point these interactions become relevant and they start affecting the
evolution of the universe—the dynamics of the universe—in a considerable
manner, causing an acceleration of the expansion. So, at that stage, the
interactions between the quantum objects which make up space produce an
acceleration which is similar in description and magnitude to the dark
energy cosmologists observe.”
“Having a dark energy phenomenological effect like this from a quantum
gravity model is very interesting,” says Ana Alonso Serrano, a physicist at
the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics in Germany, who was also
not involved in the study. “I think it is important that we explore our
quantum gravity models in this kind of way, so to see if they can make
predictions about cosmology and compare them to observations.”
“The next step will be to build on their theory, and their model, so to make
further predictions which can be compared against real cosmological
observations,” she says. “But I think there is still a long road ahead
before we really establish a good understanding about the quantum nature of
gravity, and indeed if there is a firm relationship with dark energy.”
Source: Link
Tags:
Physics
What kind of development of consciousness or development of attention must be had in order not to notice that the acceleration of the universe has never been proven? All of 2019 has been devoted to astrophysicists trying to prove it and the result is a complete failure outside the Riess theory which is completely refuted by alternative criticism. Further. What kind of awakened quantum pressure can we talk about if the Hubble constant in Riesz's theory DECREASES? Everyone, I hope, was already amused by this statement of the "new theorists"? If the Hubble constant decreases, then the quantum pressure is falling, and we cannot discuss anything else. And this means that we do not take into account some MACROSCOPIC, not microscopic factor. Again I see that logic is not taught to physicists in universities.
ReplyDelete