Pentagon released declassified report on UFO sightings

The Pentagon's long-awaited declassified report on Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Sightings (UAPs) was recently released, and despite the enthusiasm its announcement sparked, the responses in the document will disappoint many. Indeed, although they admit the existence of phenomena currently impossible to identify, the authorities remained evasive and unclear, ultimately providing no conclusive information.

In the 9-page document , the best and brightest Pentagon analysts essentially admitted that they cannot explain the vast majority of apparent UFO sightings. The report sparked immense speculation ahead of its release due to the low possibility that it would reveal anything concrete about alien life, but that did not happen.

“We have no clear indication that there is a non-terrestrial explanation for these phenomena - but we will go where the data takes us. We have no data indicating that any of these unidentified aerial phenomena are part of a foreign collection program and we have no data indicating a major technological advance by a potential adversary,” said an anonymous government official. American to NBC News shortly before the report's release.

The report itself is sometimes almost ironically vague. “There are probably several types of PAN that require different explanations depending on the range of appearances and behaviors described in the reports available. Our data analysis supports the idea that if and when individual PAN incidents are resolved, they will fall into one of five potential explanatory categories: air traffic congestion, natural atmospheric phenomena, USG or industry development programs. American, foreign adversary systems and general category”.

Some potentially interesting information

In total, the report examined 144 incidents, including 143 that were not able to be explained by investigators. But it contains some interesting references. "In a small number of cases, military aircraft systems have processed radio frequency (RF) energy associated with PAN observations."

“The UAPTF contains a small amount of data that appears to show UAPs with acceleration or some degree of voluntary steering. But additional rigorous analyzes are needed by several teams or groups of technical experts to determine the nature and validity of these data”.

Most of the more interesting information came from anonymous sources associated with the report, rather than from the document itself. “We absolutely believe that what we see are not just artifacts. These are things that exist physically,” a government source told CNN . But overall, the answers are scarce. And to be fair, the investigation was by definition extremely difficult from the start.

Source 1Source 2

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post